|
Defending with Purpose By Freddie North Last month we looked at the pros and cons of covering honours in cases other than in the trump suit. The basic rule is: 'Cover an honour with an honour if there is any prospect of promoting a winner for your side, but don't cover if it is obvious that there is nothing to be gained by doing so.' As far as the trump suit is concerned, the same principles apply. However, all too often declarer will have settled happily in his chosen suit, supported to a greater or lesser degree by his partner, so that the chances of promotion by covering one of the trump honours are bound to be minimal. Sitting in the West seat, see what you make of the following situation:
You lead the ace, king and another club, declarer trumping your partner's queen on the third round. Declarer now ad-vances the The full hand will soon tell you if you made the correct decision:
As you can see, if you covered declarer's So how do you avoid having to stop and think at the vital moment? The solution is really quite simple. Whenever you hold a critical trump honour, have a look at dummy's holding as soon as it appears on the table. Then ask yourself, if you are offered a lower honour to cover, whether there is any point in doing so. More often than not you will come up with the right answer, so that if the critical moment arrives later on, you will be able to follow at normal tempo, neither too hastily nor too slowly. Those are the players who are always the most difficult to play against.
Let's swap hats for a moment and pretend that we were playing in 4 In fact there is rather more than a small ray of hope, so you take over now. You start by cashing your spades and West has to decide whether to ruff the third round. Faced with an unattractive play if he does ruff, he declines the offer and discards a club and a diamond. This leads you to the following position with dummy to play:
You now throw West on lead with his Let's go back to the problem of "Should we cover a trump honour with an honour, or should we refuse the bait?". A great deal will depend on the bidding and what you see in dummy. Have a look at the following layouts:
In each case, when an honour is played from dummy, East should cover. In Lay-outs 1 and 2, East hopes to promote a winner for his partner. In Layout 3, however unlikely it may seem, East has to hope that by covering the jack his ten may survive.
Declarer will probably cash the ace, go to dummy with an outside entry and then play the jack. East must not cover. There is nothing to be gained by doing so.
No doubt South will have bid his suit strongly, indicating both length and strength. It would be pointless for East to cover the ten.
An experienced declarer will tempt East by playing the jack from dummy. This is an old trick. Avoid an embarrassing disaster by refusing to cover.
When the queen is played, East must not fall into South's trap. A disdainful look if you like, but the four is the card to play. Finally, here is a deal which raises a slightly different concept in the "Should I cover" stakes:
With the purpose of protecting his club holding, West leads the two of trumps, dummy plays the jack and East...? From East's point of view, his partner's lead was a trifle unfortunate, but all is not lost - well, it's not lost if East refuses to cover. Realising that his queen of trumps can overruff the dummy, he should hang on to it and allow declarer a cheap trick. Later, as declarer endeavours to establish his clubs, East will make his queen of trumps and there will still be one more trick to come. Plus 100 instead of minus 1370 seems a fair reward for knowing when not to cover. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© Bridge Plus 1999-2006 |